|
A simplex mistake
I hastily paged through to the section on Proteas. Evidently the power lines had not taken a toll on the Proteas as the only record is for Protea simplex. Her caption reads thus; "A record of the wild flowers of Natal cannot be complete without mentioning a Natal species of this family, so prolific in the Cape, Protea Simplex, the simplex meaning "unbranched."" The one found was a tiny plant growing on a hillside near Emberton. "This Protea is known as the Sugar Bush, or Suikerbos, because of the sweet juices present in the calyx, which may be concentrated and used as a cough mixture." So, on Christmas day we went to the Emberton area to locate Dr Wright's plot. We travelled around scanning likely-looking areas of grassland. Eventually at Springside Nature Reserve, totally deserted, we saw a sign for a Protea Trail. With high hopes we headed up the trail and within 100 m came upon a population of very supple looking Protea welwitchii. Going back to Dr Wright's book and rereading her description and looking at her illustrations I am sure that she has mixed up P. welwitchii with P. simplex. However she is not the only botanist to collect P. simplex in this area: J. Medley-Wood records the same species from the Fields Hill area. So does P. simplex occur in the area or have past collectors been making fundamental identification errors? A task for the Durban bound atlassers. Nicholas Cole Back PAN 30 |